Why call them master replicas, when clearly there is no sign of wear on the unit. Hans blaster never looked spiffing new, it had blemishes akimbo.
A master replica without the battle scars & wear n tear, to me, would be as embarrassing as owning a Han Solo replica, without his clothes on.
You say there is a battle damage version, no name 4 it?
I prefer the left face of the gun as there’s something about the right face that looks odd, & out of place. The rest of the gun looks spot on though.












